Discussion Question: How does technology affect our identity? Are we making our machines more human or are we adopting computerized traits? Consider the concept of the quantified self: can human existence be defined in discrete terms and what are the dangers in attempting to do so?
Weibel deals mainly with issues of epistemology (indeed literally beginning with an investigation into the division between epistemé and techné). He seems to view the convergence and mixing of previously disparate media as a relatively positive, equalizing force that emancipates knowledge and art from 'private control zones'. On the other hand Kittler is concerned with the deeper ontological questions that arise when human existence is heavily mediated by technology. He is wary of a perceived process of homogenization by which humans are transformed into discrete, programmable objects. According to Kittler, technology not only mediates our perception of reality, but increasingly defines it through a relationship of control in which we are rendered subservient.
In both articles a process is described in which new forms of layered multi-media reflect back to us seemingly more perfect versions of ourselves. Digital simulations of analog art forms appear more true, more real, to our senses than the original object of representation. In other words, we are left with representations of representations, seemingly more perfect in each layered iteration. We considered the way this process becomes enacted on human beings in increasingly efficient and direct ways: for example the popularity of digital image manipulation to 'erase' perceived physical imperfections. What are the ultimate implications of digitization for our individual and collective sense of self? Does the apparent convergence of man and machine bring us closer to or further from concepts of metaphysical truth?
No comments:
Post a Comment